Who Runs Your State

Your governor, AG, and state court control more of your daily life than Congress. In 2025, state legislatures enacted 29,000 laws. Congress enacted 72.

How Many Laws Your State Passes vs. Congress

In 2025, state legislatures across the country enacted roughly 29,000 laws. Congress enacted 72. That is a 400-to-1 ratio. The bills that decide your healthcare, your school funding, your voting rules, and your district maps are written in your state capitol.

Laws Enacted in 2025
Laws Enacted in 2025
CategoryValue
Congress (72)72
State Legislatures (29,000)29000

Congress enacted 72 laws in the 2025 session. State legislatures enacted roughly 29,000. Data: National Archives (119th Congress first session), FiscalNote 2025 State Sessions Recap.

72
laws enacted by Congress in 2025
29,000
laws enacted by state legislatures
400:1
ratio of state laws to federal

The federal government sets the floor. States decide whether to build above it or dig beneath it. Your state legislature decided whether your state expanded Medicaid, whether your public schools lost funding to vouchers, whether your district maps were fair, and whether your AG challenged federal overreach.

Congress debated those same topics. Your state acted on them.

Abortion Access Depends on Your State

The clearest proof is abortion. The same Dobbs ruling produced opposite outcomes from one state to the next, set entirely by who held power in the statehouse when it dropped. The divide is sharpest at a state line, where a near-total ban can sit a mile from a clinic that still operates.

How Each State Answered Dobbs As of June 2026. 17 states ban or sharply restrict abortion, 13 allow it with limits, and 20 plus D.C. protect it. Tap a state for detail.
Banned (near-total)
Banned at about 6 weeks
Legal, with a gestational limit
Legal and protected

Sources: Guttmacher Institute; KFF; Center for Reproductive Rights.

How Each State Answered Dobbs
State StatusDetail
Alabama Near-total banNear-total ban; life exception only.
Alaska Legal and protectedLegal; no gestational limit.
Arizona Legal and protectedProtected to viability (Prop 139, 2024).
Arkansas Near-total banNear-total ban; life exception only.
California Legal and protectedConstitutional protection; legal.
Colorado Legal and protectedConstitutional protection (Amendment 79, 2024).
Connecticut Legal and protectedLegal; protected by statute.
Delaware Legal and protectedLegal; protected by statute.
District of Columbia Legal and protectedLegal; no gestational limit.
Florida Banned at about 6 weeksBanned at about 6 weeks (2024).
Georgia Banned at about 6 weeksBanned at about 6 weeks (LIFE Act).
Hawaii Legal with a gestational limitLegal to viability.
Idaho Near-total banNear-total ban; narrow exceptions.
Illinois Legal and protectedLegal to viability; protected by statute.
Indiana Near-total banNear-total ban; limited exceptions.
Iowa Banned at about 6 weeksBanned at about 6 weeks (2024).
Kansas Legal with a gestational limitLegal; 2022 voters rejected a ban. Restrictions apply.
Kentucky Near-total banNear-total ban; narrow exceptions.
Louisiana Near-total banNear-total ban; limited exceptions.
Maine Legal and protectedLegal; broadly protected.
Maryland Legal and protectedConstitutional protection (2024).
Massachusetts Legal with a gestational limitLegal to 24 weeks.
Michigan Legal and protectedConstitutional protection (2022).
Minnesota Legal and protectedLegal; protected by statute (2023).
Mississippi Near-total banNear-total ban; the state in the Dobbs case.
Missouri Legal and protectedBan reversed by Amendment 3 (2024); access restored by a 2026 court order.
Montana Legal and protectedProtected to viability (2024 ballot).
Nebraska Legal with a gestational limitBanned at 12 weeks.
Nevada Legal with a gestational limitLegal to 24 weeks; 2024 measure must pass again in 2026.
New Hampshire Legal with a gestational limitLegal to 24 weeks.
New Jersey Legal and protectedLegal; no gestational limit.
New Mexico Legal and protectedLegal at all stages.
New York Legal and protectedConstitutional equal-rights protection (2024).
North Carolina Legal with a gestational limitBanned at 12 weeks.
North Dakota Near-total banNear-total ban; limited exceptions.
Ohio Legal and protectedConstitutional protection (Issue 1, 2023).
Oklahoma Near-total banNear-total ban; life exception only.
Oregon Legal and protectedLegal; no gestational limit.
Pennsylvania Legal with a gestational limitLegal to 24 weeks.
Rhode Island Legal with a gestational limitLegal to viability; protected by statute.
South Carolina Banned at about 6 weeksBanned at about 6 weeks.
South Dakota Near-total banNear-total ban; life exception only.
Tennessee Near-total banNear-total ban; limited exceptions.
Texas Near-total banNear-total ban; no rape or incest exception.
Utah Legal with a gestational limitBanned at 18 weeks.
Vermont Legal and protectedConstitutional protection; no gestational limit.
Virginia Legal with a gestational limitLegal into the third trimester; the only Southern state without a ban or early limit.
Washington Legal and protectedLegal; protected by statute.
West Virginia Near-total banNear-total ban; limited exceptions.
Wisconsin Legal with a gestational limitLegal to 20 weeks.
Wyoming Legal with a gestational limitA 2026 six-week ban is blocked by a court; legal pending litigation.

Medicaid Funding Your Governor Refused

The federal government covers 90% of Medicaid expansion costs. States pay 10 cents on the dollar. Ten states still refuse the money. That refusal leaves $39 billion per year on the table and 1.4 million people in the coverage gap.

Federal Medicaid Funds Left on the Table (Annual, Billions)
Federal Medicaid Funds Left on the Table (Annual, Billions)
CategoryValue
Texas$B15.6
Florida$B7.8
Georgia$B4.7
Tennessee$B3.1
South Carolina$B2.8
Alabama$B2.3
Mississippi$B1.9
Kansas$B0.624
Wyoming$B0.234

Texas alone leaves $15.6B on the table annually, keeping 1 million Texans in the coverage gap. The federal government covers 90% of expansion costs. These governors chose to reject that money. Data: KFF, Georgetown CCF.

$39B/yr
federal funds refused by 10 non-expansion states
1.4M
people in the coverage gap
90%
federal match rate (states pay only 10%)
What Non-Expansion Costs Per State 2026
Texas ($15.6B refused, 1M in gap) $15,600/person
Florida ($7.8B refused, 500K in gap) $15,600/person
Georgia ($4.7B refused, 300K in gap) $15,667/person
Tennessee ($3.1B refused, 200K in gap) $15,500/person
South Carolina ($2.8B, 180K in gap) $15,556/person
Alabama ($2.3B, 150K in gap) $15,333/person
Mississippi ($1.9B, 120K in gap) $15,833/person
Annual cost per person in gap $15,600

In non-expansion states, adults earning below 138% of the poverty line make too much for traditional Medicaid but too little for marketplace subsidies. They fall into a gap that exists only because their governor and legislature chose to create it. The cost per person in that gap is $15,600 per year in refused federal funds.

Rural hospitals absorb the consequences. Since 2010, 136 rural hospitals have closed nationwide. The closure rate in non-expansion states runs more than double the rate in expansion states. When the hospital closes, the nearest ER might be 45 minutes away.

Governor Abbott could accept $15.6 billion in federal Medicaid funds tomorrow. He refuses. One million Texans stay in the gap. That is a policy choice made by one person whose seat is on the ballot.

What Voucher Programs Cost Public Schools

Arizona's universal voucher program was budgeted at $65 million. It cost $900 million. That is 47.5% over budget. The state auditor found 76% of voucher recipients were already enrolled in private school. The program did not create new opportunity. It subsidized families who had already opted out.

Voucher Program Costs by State (Millions)
Voucher Program Costs by State (Millions)
CategoryValue
Texas (proposed)$M4500
Arizona$M900
Florida$M608
Indiana$M497

Arizona blew past its $65M budget by 47.5%, landing at $900M. Indiana's program grew 796% since 2013 to $497M (76K students). Texas proposed a $4.5B program that 65% of Texas voters oppose. Data: State education budget offices, AZ Auditor General.

Where the Money Goes
Public School Voucher
Per-pupil funding trend Down 1.5% Up 796% (Indiana since 2013)
Accountability State testing, public board, open records None required in most states
Must accept all students Yes No
Approved spending Textbooks, teachers, facilities Ninja warrior, trampoline parks, ski passes

Per-pupil public school funding fell 1.5% while Indiana voucher spending grew 796%. Voucher schools face no testing, no audits, and no civil rights requirements. Arizona families used voucher funds for ninja warrior training, trampoline parks, and ski passes. Data: NCES, AZ Auditor General, Education Week.

$300K
drained per public school on average
76%
of AZ recipients already in private school
65%
of Texas voters oppose the $4.5B proposal

For every student who leaves with a voucher, the public school loses funding but keeps the same building, the same bus route, the same heating bill. The per-school loss averages $300,000. Rural districts with one elementary school cannot absorb that cut.

Indiana's voucher program grew 796% since 2013 to $497 million for 76,000 students. Per-pupil public school funding dropped 1.5% over the same period. The money moved. The accountability did not.

Governor Abbott wants $4.5 billion for Texas vouchers. Sixty-five percent of Texas voters oppose the plan. DeSantis already spent $608 million in Florida. Every one of these programs was sold as a modest pilot. Every one exploded past projections because families already paying private tuition claimed the benefit.

State AGs Who Sued & Won

Democratic attorneys general filed 100 lawsuits against federal actions through March 2026. They won 80% of cases ruled on in 2025: 40 wins out of 51 decisions. The return on investment was roughly 1,000 to 1. About $100 million in legal spending protected more than $100 billion in federal funding and constitutional rights.

100
lawsuits filed through March 2026
80%
win rate (40 of 51 cases ruled on)
~1000:1
ROI ($100M spent, $100B+ protected)
AG Bonta Led with 67 Lawsuits Filed or Joined
AG Bonta Led with 67 Lawsuits Filed or Joined
CategoryValue
California (Bonta)67
New York (James)22
Connecticut (Tong)15
Massachusetts (Campbell)13
Washington (Ferguson/Choi)12

California AG Rob Bonta filed or joined 67 lawsuits. New York AG Letitia James led a 22-state coalition that blocked the birthright citizenship order. Connecticut AG William Tong won the Section 122 tariff lawsuit, saving households $1,300 each. Data: State AG offices, Reuters litigation tracker.

Two AGs, Same Power, Opposite Choices
AG Bonta (CA) AG Paxton (TX)
Lawsuits filed 67 (challenging federal overreach) 100 vs Biden ($6.1M spent)
Win rate 80% Impeached on 16 articles, acquitted
Result $100B+ in rights protected $271K plea on securities fraud
Next move Defending Medicaid, VRA, climate Running for U.S. Senate

The AG office is the same in every state. The person who holds it decides whether your state fights federal overreach or enables it. Paxton spent $6.1M suing the Biden administration, was impeached on 16 articles, pleaded to securities fraud for $271K, and is now running for Senate. Data: State AG offices, Texas Tribune.

The five lawsuits with the largest impact: the birthright citizenship block (James, 22-state coalition), the Section 122 tariff challenge (Tong, saved $1,300 per household), the National Guard deployment block, the OMB spending directive freeze, and the gender education order injunction.

Texas AG Ken Paxton filed 100 lawsuits against the Biden administration at a cost of $6.1 million. He was impeached on 16 articles, acquitted by the Texas Senate, pleaded to securities fraud charges for $271,000, and is now running for U.S. Senate. The contrast between Bonta and Paxton is the entire argument for why AG races matter.

More than 30 AG seats are on the 2026 ballot. The competitive races include Arizona, Minnesota, Iowa, and Kansas. Most will get less media coverage than a single congressional primary. They will have more impact on your life than the entire House freshman class combined.

State Courts & Redistricting on the Ballot

Sixty-four to 65 state supreme court seats are on the ballot in 32 states in 2026. On April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Callais v. Edwards, eviscerating Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Cook Political projects a net Republican gain of 6 to 7 House seats from Callais-enabled redistricting alone. The fight for fair maps now lives entirely in state courts.

State Supreme Court Seats on 2026 Ballots
State Supreme Court Seats on 2026 Ballots
CategoryValue
Pennsylvania (3 retention)3
Texas (3 seats, 9-0 R)3
North Carolina (1 seat)1
Michigan2
Ohio2

Pennsylvania has 3 retention seats on the ballot. If 2 justices are ousted, the court deadlocks. North Carolina's 1 seat could shift the court to 6-1 Republican. Texas has 3 seats on an already 9-0 Republican court. Data: Brennan Center, Ballotpedia.

Before 4-3 conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court (pre-2023)
After 5-2 liberal After Taylor won 58-42 (April 2026) $51M → $100M → $100M+ spent

Wisconsin proves the model. 2023: $51M race, Protasiewicz won, maps redrawn. 2025: $100M race, Crawford won by 10 points (Elon Musk spent $20M+ on the losing side). 2026: Taylor won 58-42, expanding the liberal majority to 5-2. Three elections. The entire state changed direction. Source: Brennan Center.

64-65
supreme court seats on 2026 ballots in 32 states
6-3
Callais ruling gutted Section 2 of the VRA (April 29)
6-7
net GOP House seats projected from Callais redistricting

Callais makes federal courts nearly useless for voting rights challenges. Communities of color trying to fight discriminatory maps must now go to state courts. The judges on your ballot in November will decide whether your district maps are fair for the next decade.

Wisconsin showed what one court race can do. In 2023, a $51 million race flipped the court and led to maps being redrawn within weeks. In 2025, the race cost $100 million. Elon Musk spent more than $20 million on his preferred candidate. That candidate lost. In April 2026, Taylor won 58-42, expanding the liberal majority to 5-2.

Pennsylvania is the most critical state for 2026 courts. Three justices face retention votes. If two are ousted, the court deadlocks. Judicial spending is accelerating: $100.8 million in 2021-22, $157.3 million in 2023-24, and on track to exceed that in 2026.

Who Draws Your District Lines

How those maps get drawn is itself a state choice. Where the legislature draws its own lines, the party in power can lock in its majority for a decade before a single vote is cast. A handful of states hand the job to an independent commission instead.

Redistricting Control by State As of 2026. Only 8 states use an independent redistricting commission. Tap a state for detail.
Independent commission
Advisory or backup commission
Nonpartisan process (Iowa)
Partisan legislature draws its own
Single at-large district

Sources: Brennan Center; National Conference of State Legislatures.

Redistricting Control by State
State Who draws the mapDetail
Alabama The partisan legislature draws its own
Alaska Independent commissionRedistricting Board appointed by governor, legislature, and chief justice
Arizona Independent commissionCreated by ballot measure (2000). Margins of victory 28% lower than national average.
Arkansas The partisan legislature draws its own
California Independent commissionCreated by ballot measure (2008/2010). 5 Dem + 5 Rep + 4 no party. Produced 41% of national toss-up districts from 19% of all districts.
Colorado Independent commissionCreated by ballot measure (2018). 4 Dem + 4 Rep + 4 no party. 21 hearings, 5,000+ public comments.
Connecticut Advisory or backup commission
Delaware Single at-large district
District of Columbia Single at-large district
Florida The partisan legislature draws its own
Georgia The partisan legislature draws its own
Hawaii Advisory or backup commission
Idaho Independent commissionBipartisan commission. 3 appointed by each party.
Illinois Advisory or backup commissionBackup commission if legislature deadlocks
Indiana The partisan legislature draws its own
Iowa Nonpartisan agency (Iowa)Nonpartisan legislative staff draw maps without political data. Legislature votes yes or no. Among the most competitive elections in the country.
Kansas The partisan legislature draws its own
Kentucky The partisan legislature draws its own
Louisiana The partisan legislature draws its own
Maine Advisory or backup commission
Maryland Advisory or backup commissionGovernor submits plan, legislature acts on it
Massachusetts The partisan legislature draws its own
Michigan Independent commissionCreated by ballot measure (2018). 4 Dem + 4 Rep + 5 unaffiliated. Produced most competitive district in the nation.
Minnesota The partisan legislature draws its ownCourts frequently intervene when legislature deadlocks
Mississippi Advisory or backup commissionBackup commission
Missouri The partisan legislature draws its ownHas bipartisan commission language but congressional maps drawn by legislature in practice
Montana Independent commissionDistricting and Apportionment Commission. Bipartisan with independent chair.
Nebraska The partisan legislature draws its own
Nevada The partisan legislature draws its own
New Hampshire The partisan legislature draws its own
New Jersey Advisory or backup commissionBipartisan commission with tiebreaker
New Mexico The partisan legislature draws its own
New York Advisory or backup commissionCommission prepares maps, legislature has final authority
North Carolina The partisan legislature draws its ownAmong the most extreme gerrymanders. R+26 efficiency gap in 2024 map.
North Dakota The partisan legislature draws its own
Ohio Advisory or backup commissionCommission/backstop. Courts repeatedly rejected maps in 2022.
Oklahoma The partisan legislature draws its own
Oregon The partisan legislature draws its own
Pennsylvania Advisory or backup commissionLegislative Reapportionment Commission for state maps. Congressional maps drawn by legislature.
Rhode Island The partisan legislature draws its own
South Carolina The partisan legislature draws its own
South Dakota Single at-large district
Tennessee The partisan legislature draws its own
Texas The partisan legislature draws its ownLegislative Redistricting Board as backup if legislature fails
Utah Advisory or backup commissionIndependent commission created by ballot measure (2018), but legislature ignored its maps in 2021
Vermont Single at-large district
Virginia Advisory or backup commissionCreated by constitutional amendment (2020) but commission deadlocked in 2021. Courts drew the maps. Commission structure remains.
Washington Independent commissionBipartisan commission. 2 appointed by each party + nonvoting chair.
West Virginia The partisan legislature draws its own
Wisconsin The partisan legislature draws its ownAmong the most gerrymandered states. Governor used veto to force court-drawn maps in 2024.
Wyoming Single at-large district

Every State Race in November 2026

November 2026 puts 6,279 or more state races on the ballot. Thirty-six governors, 30-plus AGs, 26 secretaries of state, 64-65 supreme court justices, and 6,122 state legislators. The typical American voter can name 1.3 of the 3 most important news stories happening right now. Most will not know who is on their state ballot until they see the names in the booth.

6,279+
total state-level races on the 2026 ballot
36
governor seats
30+
AG races (competitive: AZ, MN, IA, KS)
6,122
state legislative seats
The Turnout Gap
Presidential Year Midterm Year
Turnout rate 66% 46%
Missing voters Baseline 48M stayed home
News awareness Higher (top of ticket drives attention) 1.3 of 3 major stories known
State races decided by Coattails Who actually shows up

48 million fewer Americans vote in midterms than in presidential years. State-level races that control Medicaid, vouchers, maps, and AG power are decided entirely by midterm turnout. Data: U.S. Elections Project, Census Bureau, Pew Research.

Seventeen governor races are open seats with no incumbent. Toss-up governor races include New Hampshire, Vermont, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Nevada. Every one is either an open seat or a swing state. These governors will control Medicaid, voucher funding, AG appointments in some states, and redistricting vetoes.

Four swing states have Democratic secretaries of state defending seats in Trump-won territory: Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin. The secretary of state certifies your election results. If you watched 2020, you know what happens when that office is held by someone who does not believe in the process.

The 48 million voters who stayed home in 2022 did not lose their right to an opinion. They lost their say in who drew their maps, who ran their health program, who decided whether their kids' school kept its funding, and who their AG would be when federal overreach came knocking.

Total Cost of State Policy Failures

Add up what state policy failures actually cost. This is the annual bill for governors and legislatures who chose ideology over their own residents.

Annual Cost of State Policy Failures 2026
Medicaid non-expansion (10 states) $39B/yr
Abortion ban economic cost (IWPR) $133B/yr
Voucher overspending above projections $2.5B/yr
Preemption blocking local wages (26 states) $4,400-8,800/household
TOTAL ANNUAL COST $174.5B/yr
Texas Alone 2026
Medicaid funds refused $15.6B/yr
Abortion ban economic cost $20.4B/yr
Voucher overspending $250M/yr
TEXAS ANNUAL COST $36.25B/yr

Governor Abbott's policy choices cost Texas $36.25 billion per year. That is $15.6 billion in refused Medicaid funds, $20.4 billion in abortion ban economic losses, and $250 million in voucher overspending. One governor. One state. $36.25 billion.

Twenty-six states preempt local governments from setting their own minimum wages. The Economic Policy Institute estimates that costs workers $4,400 to $8,800 per household annually in suppressed wages. The state legislature overrides the city council. The governor signs the preemption. The worker pays the price.

Every dollar on this receipt traces back to a state official whose name appeared on a ballot. Most of them won their seats in midterm elections where fewer than half of eligible voters showed up.

Who Controls What

Every policy on this page traces to one official's choice. Every official is on your ballot.

Policy Who Decides On Ballot? Races to Watch
Medicaid expansion Governor + Legislature 36 governor races NH, MN, WI, MI, PA, NV
School vouchers Governor + Legislature 36 governor races TX, FL, AZ, IN
Abortion access State Supreme Court 64 court seats PA (3 seats), NC (1), TX (3)
Fair district maps State Supreme Court 64 court seats PA, NC, WI (already flipped)
Election rules Secretary of State 26 SoS races AZ, MI, NV, WI
Federal overreach Attorney General 30+ AG races AZ, MN, IA, KS
Local wages State Legislature 6,122 seats MN (tied 67-67), MI, WI, ME

Where Your Vote Matters Most

7 Toss-Up Governor Races

New Hampshire, Vermont, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada. All open seats or swing states. These governors control Medicaid, vouchers, and redistricting vetoes.

4 Swing-State SoS Races

Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin. Democrats defending in Trump-won states. These officials certify elections and set voting rules.

3 Critical Court Races

Pennsylvania (3 retention seats, could deadlock), North Carolina (1 seat, could go 6-1 R), Texas (3 seats on 9-0 R court). These judges decide redistricting and abortion.

Find your races: VOTE411 (full ballot by zip code) | Ballotpedia (every race, every state) | Your state page (our coverage + call scripts)

More in Who Runs Your State

Vote. And Bring Someone With You.

Letters and calls matter. But the numbers above prove something bigger: the people who control your healthcare, your schools, your maps, and your rights are on your state ballot. Not the federal one. The most powerful thing you can do is vote in every race on your ballot and make sure the people around you do the same.

48 million people stayed home in the last midterm. The margins in most state races are measured in thousands. Five percent of those missing voters would have shifted the balance in a dozen states.

  • 1. Register now. Deadlines vary by state. Some close 30 days before November. Do it today at vote.org.
  • 2. Research every race. Governor, AG, secretary of state, supreme court, state legislature. Use VOTE411 or Ballotpedia.
  • 3. Don't skip judicial races. 64 supreme court seats on the ballot. One seat in Wisconsin changed the entire state.
  • 4. Bring three people. Forward this page to three people who didn't vote last midterm. The margins are small. Your circle matters.
  • 5. Find your state page at resistnow.net/states for your candidates, call scripts, and local actions.
  • 6. Text RESIST to 50409 to contact your state legislators, governor, and AG in one message.

Continue Reading